The timely disappearance of Mies van der Rohe's [1] German Pavilion less than a year after its creation opened up more than 30 years of speculation, hypothesising and creative remembering. The lost Pavilion serves as the prototype for the actual Pavilion, an object/space of theory and discourse that has developed around the 1929 project.
Projection
Constructed on a three dimensional screen, the virtual representation of the Pavilion is not a simulation, not a model, but rather a mixture of creation and exploration, a study of light, material space and theories. An interpretation to develop an understanding of the history of the Pavilion's interpretations.
Interpretation
Glass, water, marble, steel and the reflective surfacing of glossy magazines, collective reflection of two generations of architectural theorists has split and multiplied the initial project, confounding history with an array of virtualies and cloaking the Pavilion in myth.
Reflection
The Museum of Modern Art's (New York) reconstruction (1986 in Barcelona on the original site) is an attempt to lay the discursive Pavilion to rest through the authority of built form, a mausoleum.
The virtual reconstruction propagates the Pavilion in its natural environment, the evolving swirl of information.
Gill Matthewson, in here paper Standing in the Shadows (presented at the "ACCESSORY/architecture Conference 1995" held by the Department of Architecture at the University of Auckland), has suggested that the authorship of the Pavilion may atleast in part be attributed to Lilly Reich, an accomplished designer who worked with Mies for a large part of his early career. [back]
Jeannette Winterson 1994, "Art & Lies", Random House, London. p12 [back]
Beatriz Colomina 1988, Introduction: on architecture, production and reproduction in "ARCHITECTUREPRODUCTION", Princeton Architectural Press. p7 [back]
Robin Evans 1990, Mies van der Rohe's Paradoxical Symmeries in "AA Files 19" [back]